Search for: "Sultan v. Ins*"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Readers may recall the interesting forum non conveniens case in the New South Wales Court of Appeal, Garsec Pty Ltd v His Majesty The Sultan of Brunei [2008] NSWCA 211; (2008) 250 ALR 682. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am
The claims against Sultan and the Asher defendants are barred by the doctrine of res judicata (see Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767 [1st Dept 2016] [affirming, inter alia, summary dismissal of legal malpractice claims]). [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Sultan v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Article 35 of the Law on Trademarks (Royal Decree No: 38/2000) states as follows: A punishment by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years and/or fine not exceeding [Omani Rial] RO 2000 shall be applicable to any person who: (i) counterfeits a mark registered under this law, imitates such a mark in a manner that is likely to mislead the public or uses in bad faith a counterfeited or imitated mark; (ii) knowingly sells, offers for sale or circulation or possesses with the intention to sell… [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
In Sultan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
No breach – after investigation 05600-19 Sultan bin Muhammad Al Qasimi and the Al Qasimi family v Metro, No breach – after investigation. 05599-19 Sultan bin Muhammad Al Qasimi and the Al Qasimi family v Daily Mail, No breach – after investigation. 05531-19 Sultan bin Muhammad Al Qasimi and the Al Qasimi family v The Sun, No breach – after investigation 01506-19 Sultan bin Muhammad Al Qasimi and the Al Qasimi… [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:10 am
Sultan, meanwhile, draws the short straw and has to explain the mother of all metaphor bombs that exploded in the Supreme Court when the court took oral argument in Google v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm
Yasmina Abouzzohour reflected on the legacy of Sultan Qaboos bin Said Al Said and the challenges facing Oman after Sultan Qaboos’s passing. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Sultan 5. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s cause of action for “Concealment and Failure to Self Report” is not viable because “there is no private right of action against an attorney or law firm for violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility or disciplinary rules” (Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767, 769 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s cause of action for “Concealment and Failure to Self Report” is not viable because “there is no private right of action against an attorney or law firm for violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility or disciplinary rules” (Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767, 769 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 9:58 am
Anderson were joined by Molly Reynolds to discuss the week’s big national security news including alleged war crimes committed by Russian forces in Ukraine and Torres v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 4:37 am
See Velasco v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
Article 9 breached – see this case note from Garden Court North chambers Sultan of Pahang, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 616 (25 May 2011): Sultan of Pahang not entitled to diplomatic immunity as Pahang is sultanate of Malaysia, not a state for purpose of immigration rules. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
The present judgment therefore allowed the Supreme Court to hold that the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Parvaz Akhtar [1981] QB 46 and Bibi v ECO (Dhaka) [2007] EWCA Civ 740 were wrongly decided. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:57 am
Moreover, “‘there is no private right of action against an attorney or law firm for violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility or disciplinary rules'” (Karimian v Karlin, 173 AD3d 614, 616, quoting Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767, 769; see DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814). [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:40 am
See Binta v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 6:09 pm
Tyson (1842) and Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 11:41 pm
Sultan, meanwhile, draws the short straw and has to explain the mother of all metaphor bombs that exploded in the Supreme Court during oral argument in Google v. [read post]
