Search for: "Sun Graphics Corp. v Levy, Davis & Maher, LLP"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 2:42 am
In Sun Graphics Corp. v Levy, Davis & Maher, LLP 2012 NY Slip Op 03273 Decided on April 26, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department we are not told the facts behind the decision, but the decision is clear. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 6:08 am
The claim against defendant Deborah Koplovitz, Esq., for a violation of Judiciary Law § 487(1) was properly dismissed, because the complaint does not allege that Koplovitz was counsel of record in any pending proceeding to which plaintiff was a party (Mazzocchi v Gilbert, 185 AD3d 438, 438 [1st Dept 2020], lv denied 37 NY3d 908 [2021]; Sun Graphics Corp. v Levy, Davis & Maher, LLP, 94 AD3d 669… [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:06 am
A violation of the statute may be established by evidence of the defendant’s alleged deceit (see Scarborough v Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP, 63 AD3d 1531, 1533 [4th Dept 2009]; Izko Sportswear Co., Inc. v Flaum, 25 AD3d 534, 537 [2d Dept 2006]), but “alleged deceit that is not directed at a court must occur in the course of ‘a pending judicial proceeding’ ” (Hansen v Caffry, 280 AD2d 704, 705 [3d Dept 2001], lv… [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:10 am
(See Sun Graphics Corp. v Levy, Davis & Maher, LLP, 94 AD3d 669, 669 [I st Dept 2012], citing Stanski v Ezersky, 228 AD2d 311, 313 [1st Dept 1996].) [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:50 am
” “To begin, the motion court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claims for gross negligence, breach of contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as duplicative of his legal malpractice claim, given that they are all based on the same facts and seek the same relief (Sun Graphics Corp. v Levy, Davis & Maher, LLP, 94 AD3d 669 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
