Search for: "Superior Court v. County of Alameda" Results 121 - 140 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm by Lauren
Superior Court (Plotkin) 194 Cal.App.4th 210 Two and a half months after the Third District filed its decision in the Cobb matter, the appellate courts’ Second District published its own opinion on inverse condemnation on April 12, 2011. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:08 pm by Venkat
Following the hearing, the court imposed a sanction on Facebook in the amount of $100,000, payable to the Alameda County Superior Court. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:55 am by David Ettinger
The respondents are Ana Matosantos (California’s Director of Finance), state Controller John Chiang, and Alameda County Auditor-Controller Patrick O’Connel (as representative of the class of county auditor-controllers). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:26 am by Steven G. Pearl
He filed suit, and the court (Alameda County Superior, Judge True) granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment on his claims for sexual harassment, retaliation and related causes of action. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:33 am by Will Aitchison
On motion by defendant, the case was transferred to Orange County because the court found insufficient contacts with Alameda County. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:25 pm by David O'Brien
Abobe, Apple, et al., Case no. 11574066 (Alameda County Superior Court, filed against Adobe, Intui, Google, Apple, and several others accuses companies of employment practice collusion. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:06 am by Steven G. Pearl
Prior to the final approval order in Kullar, the objectors filed their own class action, partially overlapping Kullar, in Alameda County Superior Court. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 pm by The Complex Litigator
CGC-05-447044 (Kullar)), Echeverria, represented by the same attorneys, had filed a partially overlapping putative class action against Foot Locker and others in the Alameda County Superior Court (Echeverria v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:56 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Bank, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Robert Freedman issued an $18 million fee award to plaintiffs’ counsel following eight years of litigation and 53 days of trial before the court on misclassification claims by a class of 260 bank employees. [read post]