Search for: "Superior Forwarding v. U. S"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 10:05 am
Though Jordan originally requested Othman’s extradition, it appears that the current litigation arises from the U. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:34 am
The Declaration has been distributed in español, portugués e inglés each of which also follow below. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:29 pm
MILLER, CAPTAIN, 3D PA CAVALRY, THE CAVALRY BATTLE NEAR GETTYSBURG, reprinted in 3 BATTLES AND LEADERS OF THE CIVIL WAR 406 (Robert U. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
Canada In the case of Zoutman v Graham 2019 ONSC 2834, the Ontario Superior Court granted summary judgment for general and aggravated damages in the sum of $50,000 to a doctor defamed on a website known as RateMDs.com. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 5:47 am
Dervan at the White Collar Crime Prof blog, focusing on the Delaware Supreme Court opinion in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Massachusetts, 197 U. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Basically, reasonable royalties are superior to statutory damages and disgorgement for public policy reasons. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm
George Mocsary (U. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
The court found that “[u]nder the totality of the circumstances, these facts show a nexus between [d]efendant’s white LG cellphone and the home invasion. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
’” “[u]nlike rational basis review, th[is] . . . standard does not permit us to supplant the precise interests put forward by the State with other suppositions. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Dyson, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:15 pm
In addition, FDR's name was also thrown around as an example to follow. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:41 pm
" (Emphasis added.) - Dunn NW v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:46 am
Tershakovec v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
The Court followed this playbook in Trump v. [read post]
