Search for: "Supervisors v. Rogers"
Results 21 - 40
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2016, 6:02 am
His assault claim also advanced as did his retaliation claim, in part (Rogers v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court held in the landmark civil rights case Bostock v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court held in the landmark civil rights case Bostock v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:36 am
Lange v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Judge Katsas (joined by Judges Randolph and Rogers) succinctly captures the standing analysis with an analogy: In Optimal Wireless v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Judge Katsas (joined by Judges Randolph and Rogers) succinctly captures the standing analysis with an analogy: In Optimal Wireless v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:44 pm
(County of Riverside v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:08 am
’ Rogers v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:39 am
Rogers, April 28, 2017, Johnston, T.). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
See Broussard v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:47 am
NLRB, December 11, 2015, Rogers, J.). [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:16 am
Dissenting, Judge Rogers argued that the employee presented enough evidence of a connection between his termination and his keeping a gun on UPS property to submit his claims to a jury (Holly v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
New Mexico (09-10876) — Confrontation Clause violation in allowing crime lab supervisor to testify on a forensic test done by a technician Wed., Feb. 23: Global-Tech Appliances v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:28 am
Despite having not filed their own EEOC charges, four African-American Ford employees could advance Title VII claims asserting that they suffered race bias and were retaliated against after their coworker filed an EEOC charge on behalf of herself and “a class of Black employees,” a federal district court in Illinois ruled, denying Ford’s motion to dismiss (Rogers v Ford Motor Co, July 26, 2013, Gottschall, J). [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:45 am
Both sides in the NJ voting-machines lawsuit, Gusciora v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
Clark, 18 F.3d 1337 (6th Cir. 1994), Jeffrey Mullins, Roger Clark, and others allegedly robbed three banks. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Opinion by Judge Roger W. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:11 pm
The petition argued that the Sixth Circuit ruling conflicted with Supreme Court precedent on retroactivity (especially Rogers v. [read post]
