Search for: "Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 8:10 am
From NMiss Commentor From the oral argument transcript today in Briscoe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 6:02 pm
The Supreme Court will hear argument in Briscoe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:21 pm
A Chronicle of Higher Education story discusses the confusion that remains after the 1995 Supreme Court decision in Rosenberger v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
In it's last term, the Supreme Court issued Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Just days later, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia reached a similar conclusion, eliminating the tort of criminal conversation, but for more sensible reasons. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:29 am
The Supreme Appellate Court of West Virginia recently decided to reverse a judgment of over $55,000 that had been awarded to a plaintiff after a jury trial in a negligence case filed against a public parks commission by an injured plaintiff. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:43 pm
The Virginia Supreme Court upheld both convictions, and found no violation of Confrontation rights. [read post]
2 May 2017, 5:14 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), and Hall v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:28 am
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) On June 25, 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in King v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
Kiechle, Virginia Tech.ICYMI: The NPR podcast "Throughline" has recently released an episode on Milliken v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 5:44 am
VCU, now pending before the Supreme Court of Virginia. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:18 pm
MercExchange v. eBay (E.D.Va. 2007) In July, 2007, the Virginia district court denied MercExchange’s motion for a permanent injunction against eBay. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:53 am
At Balkinization, Barry Friedman analyzes the Court's docket for the new Term and notes that business and criminal cases have dominated the Court's recent cert. grants. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 4:49 pm
The issue in this case is whether the equal rights, privileges andimmunities inherent in bar admission on motion, which the United States SupremeCourt has squarely held is a constitutionally protected privilege and immunity, SupremeCourt of Virginia v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am
Brownstein, Constitutional Myopia: The Supreme Court's Blindness to Religious Liberty and Religious Equality Values in Town of Greece v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
Although some have argued that Dookhan’s dry-labbing demonstrates the necessity of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:17 pm
Sch. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Indiana has been passing laws to restrict access to abortion—at least in part in the hopes of getting the Supreme Court to overrule Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:18 am
The Virginia Supreme Court upheld use of the written certificates because state law allows defendants to call the forensic analysts as witnesses, and Briscoe and Cypress had not done so.The Court in Melendez-Diaz indicated that an approach like Virginia's, shifting the burden of calling the witness to the defendant, would not satisfy the Sixth Amendment.Upholding the Virginia approach, said the defendants' lawyer Richard… [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court weighed in in 1927, in the notorious case of Buck v. [read post]
