Search for: "Supreme Party and Novelties, Inc"
Results 61 - 80
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2017, 5:08 pm
Kleiner Perkins owns 9.2% of Zynga, Inc. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 9:11 am
In In re Books-A-Million, Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:39 am
As a legal entity, the latter is not authorized to represent a party before the Federal Patent Court. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 5:04 pm
Robert Half Int’l Inc, Cal., No. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:10 am
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. was decided by the Supreme Court, which appeared to disregard the warning of Diamond v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
Cir. 2015), petition for cert. filed (No. 15-1182, Mar. 21, 2016), and in the briefs filed by various parties in relation to Sequenom Inc. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Sometimes, the Supreme Court seeks more information from the parties or someone else. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 10:38 am
See Fresenius USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
And the French civil Supreme Court, the Cour de Cassation, held that a corporation cannot be the author of a work protected by copyright: “une personne morale ne peut avoir la qualité d’auteur. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
PCCare247 Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 6:14 pm
The Supreme Court was clearly aware of that, but perhaps did not feel it had the expertise to define an appropriate new test. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:10 pm
SOURCE: STATEWIDE HYDRAULICS, INC. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 4:30 am
Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 1243 http://t.co/SxCrxjq2we -> Letter of Request in patent case enforced in Arctic Cat Inc. et al. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
” The motion cites the 2001 California Supreme Court Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:25 am
Martin Gebauer: “The Autocomplete Features of „Google“ and the Infringement of Personality Right – Jurisdiction to Adjudicate and Choice of Law” In its recent “Google”-decision, the German Federal Supreme Court (FSC) ruled that German courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate under Section 32 of the German Code of Civil Procedure in an action brought against Google Inc., a company seated in California, USA, for the infringement of… [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 4:33 pm
Les Laboratoires Servier & Another v Apotex Inc & Others [2014] UKSC 55 is a shorter and less formidable UK Supreme Court decision than this Kat initially feared. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:03 am
Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir.1974)). [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 11:31 am
” Ultramercial, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 5:10 pm
Gene Dx, Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
The recent UK Supreme Court case Virgin Atlantic Airway Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 46 (see IPKat here) concerned whether a finding of validity of a patent as between two parties was res judicata even if the patent was subsequently revoked. [read post]
