Search for: "Supreme Party and Novelties, Inc" Results 81 - 100 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2017, 1:39 am by Simon Holzer
As a legal entity, the latter is not authorized to represent a party before the Federal Patent Court. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 5:04 pm by Ad Law Defense
Robert Half Int’l Inc, Cal., No. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
Sequenom were denied permission to appeal to the US Supreme Court (Sequenom v Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc 136 S.Ct. 2511 (2016)).In an attempt to introduce a similar issue into the UK case, TDL argued that the patent related to a discovery, and was therefore excluded from patentability under Section 1(2)(a) UKPA 1977. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
One Florida Supreme Court case has applied the significant issues test to find that it is possible that neither party prevailed in the litigation. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:53 am by Charles Bieneman
”  It was interesting that the court felt the need to discuss this issue, and to cite the majority opinion in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:53 am by Joel R. Brandes
Kohl's Dep't Stores, Inc., 09 Civ. 7830 (RJS), 2012 WL 5177491, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Poetman Records USA, Inc. 2010 (Copyright Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinios: Party claiming copyright ownership not a rule 19 necessary party: Zimnicki v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 1243 http://t.co/SxCrxjq2we -> Letter of Request in patent case enforced in Arctic Cat Inc. et al. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: US Supreme Court refuses to hear Chicago Redskins complaint: Suzan Harjo v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Penn State registered this image in 2017 for use on metal novelty license plates and apparel. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The Supreme Court rejected taking the case as by the time it arrived to the Supreme Court it would be too late to grant a PI. [read post]