Search for: "Supreme Party and Novelties, Inc" Results 101 - 120 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm by Abhik Majumdar
Even in the west it remains something of a novelty, but its use there is certainly more frequent than in India. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:09 pm by Paul Cole
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., which sets up another foray into the patent eligible subject matter waters for the Supreme Court in the October 2011 term. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:19 pm by Kevin F. Brady
 After the parties met and conferred but failed to reach any agreement as to amounts, the Court on March 5, 2012, awarded $292,019.91 to petitioner Noam Danenberg as advancement from respondent Fitracks, Inc. in connection with his defense of claims asserted against him by Aetrex Worldwide, Inc., Fitracks’ parent, in the underlying litigation in the District of Delaware, and $276,332.13 as indemnification from Fitracks for the Court of Chancery proceeding. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
On March 2, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
On March 2, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
  Prior users could rely on two novelty provisions to invalidate a claim if the prior users could show they or someone else had previously been using the invention. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 2:08 pm by Allan Erbsen
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
Metabolite Labs., Inc., 548 U.S. 124, 127 (2006) (Breyer, J., dissenting from dismissal of petition). [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am by Stefanie Levine
Supreme Court Oral Argument In today's argument, three parties argued before the Justices (excluding Justice Roberts, who was recused from the case) and before a packed courtroom. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am by Stefanie Levine
Supreme Court Oral Argument In today's argument, three parties argued before the Justices (excluding Justice Roberts, who was recused from the case) and before a packed courtroom. [read post]