Search for: "Supreme Party and Novelties, Inc"
Results 121 - 140
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
Supreme Court Oral Argument In today's argument, three parties argued before the Justices (excluding Justice Roberts, who was recused from the case) and before a packed courtroom. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:09 am
” The Supreme Court has noted that “[i]n determining the reasonableness of a counsel fee award, the threshold issue ‘is whether the party seeking the fee prevailed in the litigation. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
The issue of infringement by a separately patented equivalent was addressed in the Supreme Court decision of Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Occlutech (Kluwer Patent Blog) Greece Court of Appeal Thessaloniki: Patent covering ornamental light device lacks novelty and inventive step: Palaiochorinos S.A. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
Mr Justice Kitchen, sitting in the Court of Appeal with Lord Justice Jacob and Longmore, dismissed the appeal in the case of Softlanding Systems Inc v KDP Software Limited and Unicom Systems Inc ([2010] EWCA Civ 1172) last week. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
Staples, Inc. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 12:14 pm
Elrac, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:50 pm
AdkinsHeld: In calculating attorneys' fees in breach of contract cases between private parties where the award of fees is not based on the terms of the contract, it is improper to use either the lodestar method or to calculate the attorney's fee by applying a flat percentage of the amount claimed. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 2:15 pm
The fact that the prior art was contemporaneous damned supposed novelty. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
Novelty (statutory bars), 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Poetman Records USA, Inc. 2010 (Copyright Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinios: Party claiming copyright ownership not a rule 19 necessary party: Zimnicki v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of USWEAR for boys clothing over US WEAR for adult’s clothing: In re USCANTEEN, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability on this specimen of use question: In re Seelect, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps North Face – ‘South Butt’ parody lawsuit comes to a quiet end (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Wales Welsh dragon copied Hong Kong dragon? [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:11 am
Ctr., Inc., 141 N.J. 346, 366-67 (1995). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Id.In interpreting this provision, “the Supreme Court has distinguished between prevailing Title VII plaintiffs and prevailing Title VII defendants. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Woo Lae Oak, Inc; Kebab Gyros, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
Digital Access, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
" That, and your claimed novelty is repetition. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: US Supreme Court refuses to hear Chicago Redskins complaint: Suzan Harjo v. [read post]
