Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2016, 6:23 am
`Following a defendant's conviction of a crime, the sentencing court may choose among a variety of dispositional options. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
The Court of Appeals accordingly reversed the district court's denial of Defendant's motion to suppress. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 7:42 am
Md. 2004).It's likely to be a long time before the Supreme Court addresses this issue if, indeed, it ever does. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:41 am
05/07/09 AP:Under Maine's Constitution, any Maine registered voter may circulate a people's veto referendum to overturn statutes. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:03 am
TDCJ just had to change their policy banning beards for Muslim prisoners because of a recent Supreme Court ruling, so we know SCOTUS thinks inmates don't comprehensively lose their First Amendment rights. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 3:25 am
The FDA's lack of funding is made even more dangerous by a Supreme Court that has routinely denied people the right to sue for dangerous drugs or medical devices. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:05 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court is expected to hear arguments today on the use of recorded jailhouse calls in the prosecution of John Odgren. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:31 am
One gets a better sense of this (and generally of the flabbiness of international treaty writing as a vehicle for the objectives of the drafters in this case) by reflecting briefly on each of Article 14's 5 paragraphs. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:14 am
’The trial court rejected defense counsel's argument and required Key's agreement to the Addendum as a condition of probation. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:32 pm
Supreme Court has said that under the 5th Amendment, the relevant parcel is the entire parcel, not just the portion of it that's affected by the regulation. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 7:20 pm
McCain campaign economic advisor Douglas Holtz-Eakin claimed that on the program "Barack Obama expressed his regret that the Supreme Court hadn't been more ';radical' and described as a ';tragedy' the Court's refusal to take up 'the issues of redistribution of wealth.' No wonder he wants to appoint judges that legislate from the bench. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:26 pm
((…) The Supreme Court has not examined the doctrine since it decided Callaghan in 1888. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:34 am
That's also why WalMart's name goes first in the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:48 pm
Supreme Court's obscenity jurisprudence, which relates to sex-based expression that is not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:49 am
The First Court ruling limits law enforcement's authority to arrest drivers for Class C misdemeanors as a pretext for searching their car. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:37 am
In so ruling, the Appellate Court upheld the district court's dismissal of plaintiffs' tort claims. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:58 am
" Concluding, the Dispatch wrote, "It's not realistic to expect the FDA, with a few hundred employees monitoring more than 11,000 drugs and medical devices, to be able to spot every safety problem before a product gets to market" and that "Congress should give people harmed by defective devices the same protections the Court has now given those harmed by dangerous drugs. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 8:17 pm
" Concluding, the Dispatch wrote, "It's not realistic to expect the FDA, with a few hundred employees monitoring more than 11,000 drugs and medical devices, to be able to spot every safety problem before a product gets to market" and that "Congress should give people harmed by defective devices the same protections the Court has now given those harmed by dangerous drugs. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:47 am
" Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has an article headlined "Elena Kagan's role on Supreme Court: defender of 'ordinary people'? [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 3:25 pm
Short answer: The Court of Criminal Appeals insisted that Spencer's attorneys prove a negative - that he could not have committed a crime - when the most that's practically possible is to debunk all the evidence against him, which they have done.Wow, look at those flying pigs! [read post]
