Search for: "Sut v City Cinemas Corp." Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 2:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under the circumstances of this case, the defendants failed to establish, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff would not have been able to prove that the premises owner did not, by its own snow and ice removal efforts, create or exacerbate the allegedly dangerous condition which caused the plaintiff's injuries (see Sut v City Cinemas Corp., 71 AD3d 759; Gil v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 39 AD3d 703; see also Robles v… [read post]