Search for: "Sweet v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm
The Transfers In the parties’ agreement (read here), Gallo and Sweet Revenge expressly represented and warranted that Gallo “created and/or wrote the Story as an employee-for-hire” of Sweet Revenge, and that the story “constitutes a work-made-for-hire pursuant to the United States Copyright Laws. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for cerebral palsy. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then continued to assess the evidence, and concluded that the shape of the KitKat chocolate bar had acquired distinctive character through use in Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, but that the Board of Appeal could not validly conclude its examination of the distinctive character acquired by the contested trade mark throughout the European Union on the basis of the percentage of the public recognising that… [read post]
10 May 2020, 6:00 am
– Arthur Schopenhauer I have to share a sweet moment with you. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm
In Maxwood v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:59 am
Gosbee v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
Respondents conceded that they are not connected to Petitioner in any way.Finally, the evidence established that SCHIEDMAYER is famous in the United States in connection with keyboard musical instruments. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
The latter is an issue that two automotive industry bodies have raised in a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.For a list of previous posts on amicus curiae briefs in FTC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Indeed, the United States argues that “Officer Perez . . . did not know that he had a duty to diligently pursue the drafting and eventual approval of the warrant by a detached magistrate. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
That explains why United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Unilever US, Inc., decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on July 9. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:44 am
GmbH v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:44 am
GmbH v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:36 am
United States v. 300 Units of Rentable Housing, Case No. 09-35990 (9th Cir. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
§337(a), which states:“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter [the entire FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:31 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
The World Trademark Review's blog caught the Kat's eye earlier this week with news that President Barack Obama has taken time off from his golfing commitments to nominate a new IP czar (technically "Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator"), Kilpatrick Townsend's Daniel Marti, though Merpel thinks he got back to the links in time to avoid choosing a new Director for the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
