Search for: "Swift Company v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
United States 3)Magwood v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
Jirak v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
(and despite plague and climate change) and resulting impacts on the species, occupied habitat (a surrogate measure for population trends and status) in the United States has increased by more than 600 percent since the early 1960s. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:56 am
In the United States District Court, Southwestern District, Tempe, Arizona Case No. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
The New York Times’ Adam Liptak covers United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 4:51 am
The Arizona Supreme Court noted, however, that “[t]he United States Supreme Court ultimately rejected the federal death knell doctrine in Coopers & Lybrand v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Chairman Schapiro further stated that the end of the program was designed “to expedite the Commission’s enforcement efforts and ensure that justice is swiftly served. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
It is the finest bench, pound for pound in the United States. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
On FRE’s part, the licence stated “we warrant for our part that the Housing Unit complies with all current legislation and is fully licensed as required to be used as residential property. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper… [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
In this connection, three salient points were made: We see no evidence of publicly owned companies in other industries behaving unethically as a pattern: No airlines cutting corners on [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 2:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
--An action under paragraph (1)(A) shall be governed under the rules and procedures set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49, United States Code. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
(2) Whether, if the petition is not granted prior to September 25, 2007 -- when Pfizer's pediatric exclusivity for Norvasc comes to an end -- the Court should instead grant the petition and order the Court of Appeals' judgment vacated under United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
(2) Whether, if the petition is not granted prior to September 25, 2007 -- when Pfizer's pediatric exclusivity for Norvasc comes to an end -- the Court should instead grant the petition and order the Court of Appeals' judgment vacated under United States v. [read post]
