Search for: "T Diaz" Results 41 - 60 of 1,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2022, 10:30 pm
THE CAPTAIN REPORTS:HAS DIAZ DE LA PORTILLA COMMITTED POLITICAL SUICIDE ????? [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm by Jamie Spencer
Can’t remember the last time a one sentence per curiam opinion was such good news. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm by Glo
Just because these individuals are in the same vehicle as the driver doesn’t mean that they’re also guilty of his actions, or have their rights thrown out the window. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 11:58 am
  I certainly don't think it's a panacea, and it may be that a determined liar like Dookhan will often not be exposed on cross. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:32 am
Although I now can't remember the name, when I was a young lawyer I remember seeing a crowd outside a misdemeanor courtroom. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:39 am by Green, Schafle & Gibbs
Diaz’s misconduct is equally troubling and worthy of punishment. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:24 pm by Richard D. Friedman
("I didn't see the stuff being handled, I didn't see the test being performed, and I didn't see the results of the test. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:27 am
" According to the Third Circuit, "[t]he ALJ then asked the vocational expert if a hypothetical individual could work as a clothing presser given the limitations that the ALJ identified in Diaz's RFC. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:19 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
  The argument doesn’t say anything about counsel from Pepperdine Law participating. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:48 pm
Harcrow, 66 M.J. 154 (C.A.A.F. 2008) (inadmissbile lab report on testing of drugs), Our reasoning in Magyari that "[b]ecause the lab technicians were merely cataloging the results of routine tests, the technicians could not reasonably expect their data entries would ‘bear testimony' against [a]ppellant at his court-martial" does not apply here.While you could argue that CAAF's decision in Harcrow (with nearly identical facts to… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am by Brian Shiffrin
[T]he only indicium of reliability sufficient to satisfy constitutional demands is the one the Constitution actually prescribes: confrontation. [read post]