Search for: "T Lakin" Results 81 - 100 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2010, 1:55 am by Dwight Sullivan
  A challenge to Judge Lind’s ruling from last week can’t come anywhere near to meeting that standard. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:50 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
  But we don’t know that LTC Lakin’s counsel didn’t receive an “extension,” file it within those 20 days or some other reasonable period before today, or meet the adjectival requirement for counsel in my prior sentence. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 5:01 am
The suit alleges that in 1999, Old Kent Mortgage charged three borrowers $100 for a credit report, paid less than that for the report, and improperly retained the difference.The problem with this theory at the hearing was that apparently Lakin didn't have any idea how much the bank paid for the reports, couldn't identify any fraudulent statements made by the bank, and couldn't produce a contract that was breached. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:36 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
  His attorney, David Coombs writes on his blog, here, that “[t]he Article 32 hearing for PFC Bradley Manning will begin on December 16, 2011 at Fort Meade, Maryland. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:16 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  It would appear that LTC Lakin doesn’t fall within the “Rational People” Venn diagram circle. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 7:40 pm by Dwight Sullivan
” But now that the military judge has denied discovery, the case can’t promote the birther cause of obtaining documents concerning President Obama if it ends in an acquittal. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 4:30 am
  The Madison Record regularly reports on civil cases, and from them we get this story:"Brad Lakin didn't know that a federal judge in Oklahoma entered default judgment of about $4... [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 5:11 pm by Howard Bashman
And online at The New York Times, Margaret Renkl has an essay titled “What Part of ‘Thou Shalt Not Kill’ Don’t We Understand? [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 11:48 pm by Dwight Sullivan
I wasn’t at the Lakin motions hearing. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:57 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Why would that justify LTC Lakin in disobeying all orders? [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 7:53 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  {And, no, “affirm the legality of his lawyers” isn’t my typo; that’s what is in the WND piece.) [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 5:57 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
(I must admit I am glad I am not the POTUS as I don’t think I could produce mine.) [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Zachary Spilman
Treasury is subsidizing the Lakin defense effort” is going too far. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:18 pm by Dwight Sullivan
 (And, of course, last Friday was the Lakin 32 that wasn’t.) [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:06 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Fukino’s July 2009 statement doesn’t drive a stake through the heart of the birthers’ conspiracy theories, I haven’t even seen an incredible explanation. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 10:24 am by Dwight Sullivan
  What Judge Lind ruled that was LTC Lakin wasn’t entitled to discovery that was irrelevant to any legally viable defense. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 6:44 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
I am surprised that in the last 9 years the Navy hasn’t seen more of those. [read post]