Search for: "T-Mobile USA, Inc."
Results 181 - 200
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Jackson (read more here) AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:32 pm
Baer has held a number of high-level positions at the Federal Trade Commission, including director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition.Under Pozen’s brief leadership, the Antitrust Division challenged the now-abandoned merger of AT&T Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., App. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:37 am
In T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:37 am
In T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (June 22, 2007) (First Appellate District, Division Five) (another case invalidating a no-class-action arbitration clause) In re: Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC Mortgage Servicing Litigation, ___ F.3d ___ (7th Cir. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 11:39 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256 (2d Cir. 2009), the Ninth Circuit held that “Congress intended the usual and long-standing principles apply – post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 7:26 am
T-Mobile Agrees to $48 million Settlement Over Alleged Misleading “Unlimited” Data Plan T-Mobile USA Inc. has reached a settlement with the FCC to pay $48 million to resolve claims that the company failed to sufficiently disclose that its unlimited data plans included constraints on data speed. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:59 pm
In the meantime, California employers should review their arbitration agreements in light of these recent developments, as well as the California Court of Appeals recent holding in Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:17 am
NARB Recommends Changes to T-Mobile Claims The National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) recommended that T-Mobile USA, Inc. improve its disclosures to customers related to its “Ditch and Switch” campaign, as well as either alter or discontinue claims capping consumer reimbursements. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256, 1268 n.12 (11th Cir. 2009); Louisiana v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
In T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 7:27 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:29 am
Discount: AT&T Inc. can lower the price it pays for T-Mobile USA Inc. if the remedies requested by regulators become too expensive, according to three people with direct knowledge of the purchase contract, Bloomberg reports. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Briefly: ACSblog and Concurring Opinions have further commentary on Tuesday’s oral argument in AT&T Mobility Services v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:03 am
Last month, three current and former employees sued T-Mobile USA Inc., claiming they were required to use company-issued smart phones to respond to work messages after hours without pay. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 5:49 am
AT&T Operations, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:44 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256, 1268 n. 12 (11th Cir. 2009). [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:27 pm
T-Mobile Faces Further Review for Its Holiday Advertisement The NAD has referred advertising claims by T-Mobile USA, Inc., to the FTC and Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) for further review after T-Mobile declined to participate in a proceeding before the NAD. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:27 pm
T-Mobile Faces Further Review for Its Holiday Advertisement The NAD has referred advertising claims by T-Mobile USA, Inc., to the FTC and Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) for further review after T-Mobile declined to participate in a proceeding before the NAD. [read post]
