Search for: "T. B.1."
Results 61 - 80
of 29,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2008, 2:55 pm
Much has been said and written about the new 403(b) regulations effective January 1, 2009, but most 403(b) plans haven’t even started to get ready for compliance. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request read:1. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 8:14 am
G 1/03 and G 2/10 relate to different cases, so cannot prima facie be considered as somehow conflicting, but Board 3.3.09 made the currently pending referral G 1/16 while handling appeal T 0437/14 asking a.o. whether the G 2/10 decision effects how some aspects of G 1/03 shall be interpreted. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This contravenes A 123(3).[5.2] The appellant has relied upon decision T 108/91 according to which, in the case of inconsistency between the claim and the totality of the disclosure it is permissible to refer to the description and, pursuant to A 69(1), to rely on the disclosure of the description to amend the claim.The findings of T 108/91 however are not applicable in the present case since, as explained with respect to the main request, there is no inconsistency between… [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
T 867/05 relates to a change from “a membrane material for use in dialysis ... [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Insgesamt kann der EDÖB inzwischen 33 Stellen für Datenschutz-Themen einsetzen.In seiner Medienmitteilung zum neuen Tätigkeitsbericht schreibt der EDÖB unter anderem: «Das am 1. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
This fulfils the first condition of A 105(1)(b), which provision, according to its wording, not only covers the summons to cease using the invention but also in general the summons to stop the alleged patent infringement. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
This fulfils the first condition of A 105(1)(b), which provision, according to its wording, not only covers the summons to cease using the invention but also in general the summons to stop the alleged patent infringement. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:33 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) reads as follows: (b) During an Inquiry into the Validity of a Verdict or Indictment. (1) Prohibited Testimony or Other Evidence. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:16 pm
Nov. 19, 1997), held that only (a)(1)(B) applied to false designation of geographic origin, but the court here disagrees. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The [opponents] concluded that in view of decision T 593/09 the grounds pursuant to A 100(b) make it impossible to maintain the patent.[2.2] The catchword of decision T 593/09 (which has been distributed by [opponent 1] during the oral proceedings before the Board) stipulates that where a claim contains an ill-defined parameter and where, as a consequence, the skilled person would not know whether he was working within or outside of the scope of the claim, this,… [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm
G 1/12, Nr. 39 der Gründe, T 615/14, Nr. 1.7.1 der Gründe).9. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:43 am
The opposition division found that the grounds for opposition pursuant to Article 100(b) and 100(a) EPC in combination with Articles 52(1) and 54(1),(2) EPC did not prejudice the maintenance of the patent as granted. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The enabling disclosure for this embodiment, in particular for the first part of feature b) and feature c) of claim 1, relies on the content of patent applications WO 00/46680 ([INC1]), US 09/378184 (INC2) and US 09/378220 (INC3) incorporated by reference. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 3:06 pm
BearingPoint is number 24 while we couldn't quickly spot CapGemini in this list.Here are some impressive (rounded) numbersPricewaterhouseCoopersRank 1, Revenue $22 B, Employees 142,000Deloitte and ToucheRank 2, Revenue $20 B, Employees 132,000Ernst and YoungRank 3, Revenue $18 B, Employees 114,000KPMGRank 4, Revenue $17 B, Employees 113,000AccentureRank 5, Revenue $17 B, Employees 146,000BearingPointRank 24, Revenue $4 B,… [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the knowledge of the method and the conditions for determining the parameter is required for the parameter to be unambiguously defined (see T 412/02 [5.8-9]). [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Angela Watson was dispatched by her union to work on a project for Diamond B as a pipefitter. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
BarnesandNoble.com, LLC, No. 1:12-cv-04374, 2014 BL 263099 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:36 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) provides that A statement is not hearsay if... [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:52 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) provides that A statement is not hearsay if... [read post]
