Search for: "T. G., II"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2007, 1:14 pm
E-mailer Saul sends along this article that includes Benedict's reaction to a question about Vatican II: To a priest who told him about his disappointment with the many dreams that were awakened in him by Vatican... [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 12:29 am
But it doesn't form part of the CJI's summary. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
The referral is pending as case G 2/12. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
G 2/08 [5.10.7] also refers to “well-established case law” which includes decisions T 19/86, T 893/90 and T 233/96, all of which pertain to a novel group of subjects treated and were relied on by the appellant-opponent. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 3:18 am
Kai Ambos (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen - Law) has published Treatise on International Criminal Law: Volume II: The Crimes and Sentencing (Oxford Univ. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Turning to G 6/91 cited by the appellant-opponent, this decision by the EBA considered the questions concerning inter alia filing requirements for fee reduction under R 6(3) arising in a specific case in which an appeal was filed in the form of a letter in Dutch accompanied by a translation into English, cf. summary, point II. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
The following is Part II of a two-part conversation. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am
The Enlarged Board may rephrase the referred questions, for example, if this is appropriate and useful in order to better address the legal issues concerned (G 2/19, A.II; G 1/12, OJ EPO 2014, A114, Reasons, point 16; G 3/19, OJ EPO 2020, A119, Reasons, point III).II. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
On 7 December, the Board of Appeal posted a communication on their website wherein the decision in case T 1063/18 on the patentability of plants was summarized (see here). [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
Wilton McDonald II had some special challenges in building up a small legal practice. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
Here is another textbook example of a disclaimer that does not fulfil the requirements established in G 1/03.The patent proprietor filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke the opposed patent.The Board found the (main) request I to lack novelty over document D1 (prior art under A 54(3)(4)), and auxiliary requests II and III not to comply with A 123(2). [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:46 am
G Is for GI Bill. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 5:22 am
The therapist is hardly in a position to state that records will cause harm if the records don’t exist yet. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:34 am
This position was made clear by the EBA in G 2/12 (Broccoli/Tomato II). [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:44 pm
Don't miss this LIVE presentation this Thursday June 24 with your host, Michael G. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:51 am
In T 1063/18, the Board of Appeal found that amended Rule 28(2) EPC is in conflict with Article 53(b) EPC as interpreted by the EBA in G 2/12 (Broccoli/Tomato II). [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This conclusion is in line with the findings in decision G 12/91 for the following reasons.[7] According to the facts underlying the referral decision in case G 12/91, it was not indicated in the decision of the first-instance department on which date the formalities section had handed over the decision to the EPO postal service (see G 12/91 [II]). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:15 am
T 0258/21, IPKat). [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:43 am
It means "exclusive, select" (OED):1962 G. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am
"II. [read post]
