Search for: "T. Halliburton"
Results 21 - 40
of 579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 10:56 am
Will the United States Supreme Court’s decision on Halliburton impact Canadian securities class actions? [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm
"David Boies on Halliburton's end: remembering a daughter and a disaster that wasn't. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:28 am
"Supreme Court Sides With KBR, Halliburton on Lawsuit Time Limits; Court rules whistleblowers don't get extra time to file civil false-claims suits when the U.S. is at war": Brent Kendall of The Wall Street Journal has this news update. [read post]
28 May 2008, 8:33 pm
A federal judge in Houston threw out the lawsuits in September 2006, saying the judiciary can't second-guess the military's battlefield decisions. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 8:40 am
Attorney LaSorsa sees first hand how many big corporations don't take sexual harassment claims seriously and instead hand out very inadequate discipline against the harassor. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:00 am
This is the second post in our series on the Supreme Court’s coming ruling in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:53 pm
Halliburton Co., the US Supreme Court said that securities fraud plaintiffs don't have to demonstrate loss causation to receive class certification. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:07 am
The Halliburton case has been pending since June 2002. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:42 am
Click the following link to read the Washington Post account of the false claims settlement with the Halliburton subsidiary. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:41 am
Also, Halliburton. [read post]
2 May 2015, 5:00 am
When the company wouldn't correct its practices, he went to... [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:00 pm
I haven’t posted about the Supreme Court’s decision in Erica P. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 8:35 am
KBR, KBR and Halliburton claim that they didn’t know about the sodium dichromate until late July or August, they claim that they told the Army immediately, they claim that they never used sodium dichromate, and they claim that no one was injured from the exposure. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:03 am
“[T]he presumption of reliance [is] rebuttable rather than conclusive. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:50 pm
Counsel for Halliburton didn’t seem to get support on that point from any of the Justices you would have expected to be supporting him there. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:34 am
As Alison Frankel noted in a May 28, 2014 post on her On the Case blog entitled “After Halliburton, SCOTUS has Another Securities Litigation Puzzler” (here), “Halliburton has cast such an enormous shadow that the court’s next big securities case hasn’t gotten much attention. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:16 pm
But don’t worry: Halliburton’s counsel said trial courts have powers to require more discovery. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:17 am
But while we can’t be sure what the outcome will be, we can start to think about what will happen if the Supreme Court overturns Basic. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:17 pm
But wouldn't all this be decided at the MTD stage during the discovery stay anyway? [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:23 am
As Halliburton’s counsel explained, “[i]t’s very unusual outside of the context of the Second Circuit which allows rebuttal with respect to price impact. [read post]
