Search for: "T. V. P."
Results 21 - 40
of 16,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 1:34 pm
It's been over ten years since Alan v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:41 pm
Counciland Commission and in Case T-315/01 Kadi v. [read post]
28 May 2016, 1:14 pm
The post Jeffrey P. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:23 pm
The Facts and The HoldingHughes v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:27 pm
Concepcion. _______________________________________________ The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
The Court however reiterated that a Member State which had granted or sought to be allowed to grant aid under one of the exceptions provided for in the Treaty rules had a duty to cooperate with the Commission in the proceeding in which it took part, pursuant to which it must in particular provided all the information necessary to enable the Commission to verify that the conditions for the derogation sought were fulfilled (Case C‑364/90 Italy v Commission [1993]; Joined Cases… [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
That was rejected by the Supreme Court’s majority as being based upon a misreading of earlier authorities, in particular R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2015] AC 49. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 1:13 am
Id. at p. 837. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
Fong (1951) 37 Cal.2d 356, 370, 232 P.2d 241; see Borello, at p. 350, 256 Cal.Rptr. 543, 769 P.2d 399; Kowalski v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:00 am
In the Matter of Felton R. v Gloria P., Felton R. no longer wanted to be held to his paternal responsibilities. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 10:29 am
Funding, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:14 am
Vždy ukládat peníze, spolu s tím, že se stále učí, jak hrát poker, aby přinesli domů. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:57 pm
I am delighted to post this blog courtesy of Professor Richard Reuben of the University of Missouri School of Law: I finally had occasion to take a close look at AT&T v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:02 am
By Eric Goldman Scott P. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
A consequence thereof is that the claims must be clear in themselves when read by the person skilled in the art, without any reference to the content of the description (see T 2/80 [2]; T 1129/97 [2.1.2]; T 2006/09 [4]). [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:39 am
McCall v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
In the case of R (o.t.a P & others) v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 9:55 am
Complaint a&p Stop&Shop False Advertising [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 11:08 am
IpVenture therefore did have standing to bring the case and didn't have to join H-P as a party. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 9:40 pm
That court upheld the Council decision in its judgment in Case T-84/03 Turco v Council. [read post]
