Search for: "TAFF v. STATE"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2016, 4:01 am
In order to ascertain whether the works constituted “works of repair”, it was necessary to compare the property in its actual state with its previous state (Quick v Taff Ely Borough Council [1985] EWCA Civ 1). [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm
It was common ground that, following Quick v Taff Ely BC, there was no liability for condensation per se on SLFHA's part. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm
It was common ground that, following Quick v Taff Ely BC, there was no liability for condensation per se on SLFHA's part. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 12:37 pm
” Moreover, FINRA’s website specifically states that “[s]taff-issued interpretive letters express staff views and opinions only and are not binding on FINRA and its Board. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 7:58 am
Quick v Taff Ely BC [1986] QB 809 provided that an obligation to repair (including any potential remedy to a design fault) was not triggered until there was disrepair. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:39 am
Cal.) in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:05 pm
Giboney v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
Hnat (Taff & Davies, attorneys; Mr. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
