Search for: "TARGET CORPORATION v. US " Results 1 - 20 of 2,521
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
In a forthcoming article, titled Racial Targets, I address the legal status and defensibility of corporate hiring and promotion pledges. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
In a forthcoming article, titled Racial Targets, I address the legal status and defensibility of corporate hiring and promotion pledges. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 6:48 am by Daniel Jin
The post <i>Soriano v Forensic News</i> – Can a US corporation with no EU operations be caught by the GDPR? [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:52 pm by sgottlieb
But their choice of legal targets make clear what they really believe. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:05 am by William S. Dodge
Third, NSO has itself been sanctioned by the United States for supplying “spyware to foreign governments that used these tools to maliciously target government officials, journalists, businesspeople, activists, academics, and embassy workers. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF; merit briefs] Tuesday in Sorrell v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Bob Ambrogi
In addition, corporate counsel can  build “teams” of freelance lawyers to use as they need them. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm
Here's the first paragraph of that opinion, which recounts quite concisely what the opinion is about:"After David Salazar bought Target Corporation’s White Baking Morsels incorrectly thinking they contained white chocolate, he filed this class action against Target for false advertising under various consumer protection statutes. [read post]