Search for: "TART v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2014, 8:29 am
Now, in Tart v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:06 am
The case, Bond v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:54 am
The argument in Bond v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:50 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:36 am
So, of course, I had to look up the case, which is Nix v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:26 pm
At oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:22 am
Dickerhoff discussed her employment opportunities upon her release from jail, [Stephens] suggested she should `[s]tart swinging dope’. . . . [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:16 pm
What follows are my impressions of the oral argument that took place in Pacific Operators Offshore v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Cubatabaco v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
See James v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
In a very short judgment about asset freezing orders the Court of Appeal has made some tart observations about the inchoate nature of Strasbourg’s rulings. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:16 pm
” The Court’s second round of review of the case, in Stern v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:54 am
§ 504(c)(2); see, e.g., Yurman Design, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
Minsky v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
Fritz Zwicky, the tart-tongued scientist (discoverer of, among other things, supernovae and neutron stars) was wont to label his critics in the astrophysical world (of whom there were many) “spherical bastards. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
Basic black uniforms also clad baseball umpires, who are compared to justices in “The Deciders: Umpires v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 8:23 pm
(Or any that would answer the Second Circuit's tart question, "Which side is favored by skinny jurors? [read post]
