Search for: "TAXPAYERS OF MICHIGAN V STATE OF MICHIGAN "
Results 81 - 100
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:38 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
Michigan Department of Treasury, 16-698, and DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 2:35 pm
Friday, I argued that there's mo First Amendment problem with compulsory union agency fees in Janus v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 12:56 pm
The absence of any discussion of standing was particularly glaring in Lake Michigan Federation v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am
Michigan Department of Treasury, 16-698 Issues: (1) Whether a state, without violating the constitutional bar against the impairment of contracts, can retroactively withdraw from the Multistate Tax Compact so as to divest taxpayers of benefits under that compact for a period of 6 1/2 years before that withdrawal; and (2) whether, consistent with due process, a state can, by statute, change its tax laws retroactively for a period of more than six years, when the… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
This autopilot approach tends to provide the greatest clarity and predictability for taxpayers, though at a modest cost of state control. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 5:11 pm
City of Tacoma v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:27 am
These how we invested in community colleges and land grant colleges like Michigan State....So the people in Flint, and across Michigan, and around the country -- individuals and church groups and non-for-profits and community organizations -- you've proven that the American people will step up when required. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 1:38 am
[Cleveland Taxpayers for the Ohio Constitution v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:52 pm
Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae, Corboy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:54 pm
United States: The case seeks to resolve a circuit split over the statutory interpretation ofthe Bank Secrecy Act, which generally requires taxpayers to report their interests in foreign bank accounts. [read post]
27 May 2013, 10:02 am
Lancaster, in Clark v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 16-833, which the court denied, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
