Search for: "TAYLOR V LEWIS"
Results 1 - 20
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Blog Post: Practical Guidance Offers Help with Workplace Issues during Mental Health Awareness Month
13 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See Bradford v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia The decision in the defamation case brought by former political staffer, Bruce Lehrmann, against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson was due to be handed down this week, however the ruling has been delayed due to fresh evidence being given by former Channel Seven producer Taylor Auerbach. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
” Sufian Taha and Adam Taylor report for the Washington Post. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
On Thursday 14 March 2024 there was a contempt application in the case of Taylor v Chief Constable of Kent, QB-2022-000310. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
As mentioned above, on 27 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down in Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [2024] EWHC 400 (KB) by Lewis J. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
There was also an extension application by the Claimant and an application by the Defendant for strike out and/or summary judgment before HH Lewis in the case of Matthews v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council KB-2023-002991. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
Reserved Judgments Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulesan, heard 22 and 23 January 2024 (Collins Rice J) Sinton v Maybourne Hotels Limited, heard 19 and 20 December 2023 (Chamberlain J) Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Wilson v Mendelsohn and others, heard 4 to 8 December 2023 (HHJ… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 27 November 2023, HHJ Lewis dismissed the defendant’s application for summary judgement in the case of Iqbal v Geo TV Limited [2023] EWHC 3024 (KB). [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On the same day there was a hearing in the case of Taylor v Crouch and another before Nicklin J. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:36 am
Taylor Shaye Designs LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
On the same day there was a directions hearing in the case of Kent Police v Taylor before Nicklin J. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
Also on 17 July 2023, Collins Rice J granted judgment in default to the claimant and McGee v Lewis [2023] EWHC 1813 (KB). [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
In July 2022, the Arizona Republic reported on the mysterious source of more than $2 million that had been spent on television ads to help Lake win her Republican primary contest against wealthy developer Karrin Taylor Robson. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
On 1 December 2022, judgement was handed down in Taylor v Victorian Institute of Teaching (Human Rights) [2022] VCAT 1367. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Yet, in his plurality decision, then-Justice Lewis F. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
As Lucy Lewis and Hazel Oliver point out, however, no Employment Bill subsequently appeared – not even on the very limited issue of allocating tips, specifically mentioned in the Speech. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has an article summarising and commenting on the 30 March 2022 judgment of Chief Constable of Kent Police & Anor v Taylor [2022] EWHC 737 (QB), in which Saini J allowed a claim for breach of confidence arising from the Defendant’s refusal to delete videos that a law firm that had accidentally disclosed to him and which contained sensitive information about a vulnerable minor. [read post]
