Search for: "TEAGUE v. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2010, 12:26 pm
Thompson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
Estas peticiones, como se menciona en la propia decisión mayoritaria, serán evaluadas según los estrictos requisitos establecidos en la opinión por pluralidad de Teague v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:36 am
Continuing its tradition of thoughtful (and often divided) post-Booker work, the Sixth Circuit today in Valentine v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Teague v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:05 pm
Shouldn't both the limitation on applying new rules of Teague v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:12 am
He writes that "Under Teague v. [read post]
CA1: the First says that 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) is constitutional, because it isn't a rule of decision
8 Feb 2008, 12:42 pm
Teague v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:50 pm
And prior to Teague, in DeStefano v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 8:59 am
In a couple of weeks, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case of Kahler v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 5:40 pm
Teague, 212 N.J. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
In my latest FindLaw column, I use last week's Supreme Court decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
Pole position belongs to state-on-top habeas case Beard v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:32 am
It adopted the anti-retroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:56 am
" Id. at *4; citing Teague v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:56 am
” Id. at *4; citing Teague v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:56 am
” Id. at *4; citing Teague v. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 5:47 pm
Forsman in Whorton v. [read post]
