Search for: "THE DEBTOR v. DOE"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2009, 11:47 am
In that decision, the Court ruled that a bankruptcy trustee loses the chance to contest the value of an asset the debtor wants to keep if the trustee does not object within 30 days. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:49 pm
In Khan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:49 pm
In Khan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:49 pm
In Khan v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:24 am
In the bankruptcy world, we’ve all been trained that Section 523 does not apply in cases filed by non-individual debtors. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:24 am
In the bankruptcy world, we’ve all been trained that Section 523 does not apply in cases filed by non-individual debtors. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:24 am
Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, No. 05-996 (February 21, 2007), the United States Supreme Court held that an individual debtor does not have an unqualified... [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:41 am
How Does a Creditor Collect a Debt Against a Deceased Debtor in Ohio? [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 5:46 am
Riggs v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:00 am
So how does the absolute priority rule affect individual debtors? [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Bankruptcy courts in Idaho and Michigan have held that the discharge exceptions in Subchapter V apply only to individual debtors. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:32 am
In Botkin v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:29 am
A 2016 Supreme Court case, Husky International v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:29 am
A 2016 Supreme Court case, Husky International v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
Subchapter V permits, but does not require, the debtor to make adequate protection payments through the trustee. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 1:53 pm
UPS Capital Business v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
Messer, Angela Messer, Debtors Daren Messer & Angela Messer v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
See Bullard v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 8:16 pm
On Tuesday, in Ransom v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 12:46 pm
Although the surety undertakes to be liable if the principal debtor does not pay the debt, the surety does not become a co-debtor with the principal debtor, nor does the surety become a co-debtor with any of the co-sureties, unless they have agreed to that effect. [read post]
