Search for: "THE DEBTOR v. DOE"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 12:46 pm
Although the surety undertakes to be liable if the principal debtor does not pay the debt, the surety does not become a co-debtor with the principal debtor, nor does the surety become a co-debtor with any of the co-sureties, unless they have agreed to that effect. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 8:54 pm
September, 2008) Issue: Does a chapter 13 debtor have an absolute right to dismiss his case? [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 4:00 pm
Per Lawyer's Weekly USA, Feb. 22, 2007: "A Chapter 7 debtor does not have an absolute right to convert to a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing where the debtor engaged in "bad faith" conduct, the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 9:42 am
Dowling v. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 9:42 am
Dowling v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 6:57 am
That Act was the basis for the lawsuit in Aguayo v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 5:50 pm
November 2008) Issue: Does the debtor's admission that he did not keep business records establish a prima facie case that his discharge should be... [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:20 am
The Debtors complain that Household Finance first misled the Debtors into believing that the loan they would receive would be the "best available" and on terms favorable to the Debtors. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 9:12 am
In New Jersey there is long standing case law, Judd v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
Supreme Court decided the case of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:39 am
The case is Franasiak v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:46 am
In the first argument of the new Term, Ransom v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
” Id.Where the Act “itself does not speak directly to the issue, the Cour [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:38 pm
Hess v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
The case, Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:55 am
The case is Osborne, v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 6:13 am
A debtor in Texas was in trouble for this reason in Reed v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:28 pm
Harris v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 11:07 am
Ford Motor Credit Company v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
If you think about it, this makes sense since postpetition earnings of the debtor constitute the principal means of funding the chapter 13 plan.This allows upward or downward adjustment of plan payments in response to changes in the debtor's circumstances that substantially affect the ability to make future payments.Ok, so what does this mean in English? [read post]
