Search for: "THE WELLNESS PLAN V CITY OF OAK PARK"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
Rossignol v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
” Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am
The Revised Project’s approval was upheld on Petitioners’ two subsequent administrative appeals to the Planning Commission and City Council. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
§§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4)(“the RFRA”).[6] (Even though the RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, City of Boerne v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:02 am
The Vickerys' builder emailed the City of Pensacola (the City) to inform it that the Vickerys planned to remove the tree. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:52 am
Code Regs., § 13096; McAllister v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:52 am
’ The Court cited San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
The case is Coalition for an Equitable Westlake/MacArthur Park v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The trial court ruled against the lead agency and developer (Gelfand) based upon CEQA claims and violation of the City’s oak tree ordinance. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The trial court ruled against the lead agency and developer (Gelfand) based upon CEQA claims and violation of the City’s oak tree ordinance. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
TAKINGS Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
City of San Juan Capistrano, 2020 U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The Court then reversed the district court’s denial of the State’s renewed JMOL motion on the Penn Central test as well. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The trial court ruled against the lead agency and developer (Gelfand) based upon CEQA claims and violation of the City’s oak tree ordinance. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
The Court then reversed the district court’s denial of the State’s renewed JMOL motion on the Penn Central test as well. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
The Court then reversed the district court’s denial of the State’s renewed JMOL motion on the Penn Central test as well. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
The Court then reversed the district court’s denial of the State’s renewed JMOL motion on the Penn Central test as well. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Oaks. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:56 am
(Citing, e.g., Rich v. [read post]
