Search for: "THOMAS et al v. TRUMP" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm by Michael C. Dorf
After rage-tweeting throughout the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Silja Voeneky, et. al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence:  Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2022). 82. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Jon May
Had he, there would be no need for the constitutional crisis that would arise from the interpretation of the law advocated by Tribe, et al. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Trump’s Authoritarian Presidency”Expert Statement Bright Line WatchJohn Carey (John Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences, Dartmouth College), Gretchen Helmke (Thomas H. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
(The Trump administration sought a form of cost-cost regulatory budget analysis in EO 13,771, which President Biden rescinded on his first day.[3]) Biden has now moved to reinvigorate and “modernize” presidential regulatory review via OIRA, using improved BCA. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
Catherine Banet, et. al., eds., Resilience in Energy, Infrastructure, and Natural Resources Law:  Examining Legal Pathways for Sustainability in Times of Disruption (2022). [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm by Jonathan Movroydis
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the US Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Lawyers for Murdoch told the court that the article falsely claimed, among other imputations, that Murdoch “illegally conspired with Trump to overturn the presidential election result” and “knowingly entered into a criminal conspiracy with Donald Trump and a large number of Fox News commentators to overturn the 2020 election result”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
The brief contains 7 shoutouts to Justice Thomas, but I wonder if his credibility has taken a hit. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 4:49 pm by Dennis Crouch
Neapco Holdings LLC, et al., No. 20-891 (patent eligibility); and PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 07567-21 Ranger v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (201), No breach – after investigation 07566-21 Ranger v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 06518-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 06401-21 League Against Cruel Sports v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 05940-21 Cygnet Health Care Ltd and Dr Tony Romero v… [read post]