Search for: "THOMAS et al v. TRUMP" Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda:     THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto     Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020)    July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing these comments. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:58 am by Josh Blackman
Randolph, et al. for leave to intervene as respondents are dismissed as moot. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
The National Security Archive et. al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 8:03 am by Eric Goldman
More likely, it’s because law enforcement has invested less in child sex trafficking enforcement post-FOSTA for well-documented reasons. * Kendra Albert et al, FOSTA in Legal Context (2020). [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
First up will be the ACA's defenders, the intervenor states (California, et al.) and the House of Representatives, followed by the Solicitor General and the plaintiffs. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:23 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Clayton County is a Georgia case in which a county employee was fired after he joined a gay softball league.Altitude Express, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without A Handle:  A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1]  This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]