Search for: "THOMAS et al v. TRUMP" Results 61 - 80 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
Catherine Banet, et. al., eds., Resilience in Energy, Infrastructure, and Natural Resources Law:  Examining Legal Pathways for Sustainability in Times of Disruption (2022). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
”8 These tactics were largely effective: because of the lawsuits, the New York Times pulled its Alabama reporter for several years, sharply limiting its original reporting on events there.9 Both NYT v Sullivan and Abernathy et al. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 07567-21 Ranger v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (201), No breach – after investigation 07566-21 Ranger v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 06518-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 06401-21 League Against Cruel Sports v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 05940-21 Cygnet Health Care Ltd and Dr Tony Romero v… [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 8:03 am by Eric Goldman
More likely, it’s because law enforcement has invested less in child sex trafficking enforcement post-FOSTA for well-documented reasons. * Kendra Albert et al, FOSTA in Legal Context (2020). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:23 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Clayton County is a Georgia case in which a county employee was fired after he joined a gay softball league.Altitude Express, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cotter, et al., Integrating the Right of Publicity with First Amendment and Copyright Preemption Analysis, 33 Colum. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
My book also features a slashing constitutional critique of the exclusionary rule, placing my views in line with — actually to the right of — Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas Alito, and opposed to the views typically championed by Justices Ginsburg and Breyer (and before them, Justices Stevens, Souter, Brennan, Marshall, et al.). [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Adam Feldman
Consovoy’s briefs were on behalf of Former Attorneys and the Southeastern Legal Foundation in the Husted and Trump v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:22 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Shaw et. al., Intellectual Disability, the Death Penalty, and Jurors, 58 JURIMETRICS J. 437 (2018). 11. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Cunningham, et al. as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Neither Party, In Re: Donald J. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Silja Voeneky, et. al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence:  Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2022). 82. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without A Handle:  A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1]  This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am by stevemehta
Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Pearson, L.L.P., et al., Super. [read post]