Search for: "THOMAS v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES" Results 1 - 20 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2009, 3:17 am
Using Motor Vehicle Data to Solicit Legal Clients Would Violate Federal Privacy LawThis posting was written by Thomas A. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:24 pm
  The petitioner's policy with Thomas covered a motor vehicle not involved in the accident under which Thomas was a named insured. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
This is a proceeding wherein the defendant is charged with one count each of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Intoxicated pursuant to VTL §1192.3 and Operating a Motor Vehicle While Impaired pursuant to VTL §1192.1. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 8:38 am by John W. Arden
The DPPA regulates the disclosure of personal information contained in the records of state motor vehicle departments. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
The Department of Labor’s OSHA Whistleblower Protection Program enforces the whistleblower provisions of more than twenty whistleblower statutes protecting employees who report violations of various workplace safety, airline, commercial motor carrier, consumer product, environmental, financial reform, food safety, health insurance reform, motor vehicle safety, nuclear, pipeline, public transportation agency, railroad, maritime, and securities laws. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Sean Moloney
In its 8-0 decision in Williamson v Mazda Motor of America, Inc. earlier this year, the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:58 pm by WIMS
" Among the regions is the heavily wooded area surrounding the city of Fort Thomas (a suburb of Cincinnati, Ohio), whose residents have suffered increasingly from motor vehicle collisions with deer, landscaping damage due to deer, and other cervid-perpetrated problems. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am by Rory Little
” Although at least two justices (Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas) have criticized this “categorical” approach, it is the accepted precedent today, as the court once again recognized last term in Sessions v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Investigating Agencies Federal Bureau of Investigation California Department of Motor Vehicles-Investigations Division A complaint is not evidence that the defendants committed the crimes charged. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Investigating Agencies Federal Bureau of Investigation California Department of Motor Vehicles-Investigations Division A complaint is not evidence that the defendants committed the crimes charged. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:17 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision upheld a decision by the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles Board to reject an application by Sons of Confederate Veterans for the issuance of a specialty license plate design featuring a Confederate battle flag. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
  In the case at bar, plaintiffs dispute that NYCTA is in the business of renting or leasing motor vehicles. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 pm by Russell Jackson
  In Geier, the Department of Transportation had, in federal motor vehicle safety standard 208, preserved the ability of a manufacturer to choose whether to have seatbelts or airbags (or both). [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Id. at 591 (“No exigent circumstances other than the motor vehicle itself are required in order to justify a warrantless search of a motor vehicle in a public place based on probable cause to believe that it contains the instrumentality of or pertains to a crime. [read post]