Search for: "THOMAS v. JOHNSON "
Results 121 - 140
of 927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2017, 6:47 am
We asked Greg Ablavsky to comment on that dissent [Part II will be later today]: What Justice Thomas Gets Wrong About Constitutional History: Part I—the Indian Commerce Clause Just in time for the end of Native American Heritage Month, Justice Thomas has written a dissent from the Court’s denial of certoriari in Upstate Citizens for Equality v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:37 pm
In Horne v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
Ct. 1265 (2010) Johnson v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:46 am
Attorney Brendan V. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
Justice Thomas questions petitioner’s lawyer in Flowers v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:55 pm
Kirk Johnson of the New York Times reportshere on what both sides expect will be a new push for limitations on abortion as a result of Wednesday's ruling. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:32 am
To reach that conclusion, the court relied on Johnson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:11 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court later held that the Tenure Act as unconstitutional in Myers v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:40 am
Johnson, 481 U. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 9:23 am
The certiorari petitions of Donte Johnson and Marlo Thomas remain pending before the Supreme Court and are presumably being held for consideration along with Fields. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:39 am
The case, New York Times v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:13 am
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Amicus brief of 22 law professors The Court has not yet ruled on the cert. petitions filed by Marlo Thomas and Donte Johnson. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 3:39 pm
Thomas Remmert, No. 105,091 (Butler)Direct appeal; Agg criminal sodomyJoanna Labastida (brief), Korey Kaul (argue)[Affirmed; Rosen; January 17, 2014]Improper admission of prior bad act evidenceInsufficient evidenceFailure to grant downward depatureState v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:43 am
Case Name: Holman v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 2:44 am
The Second Circuit revives the case.The case is Aulicino v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:59 am
Justice Thomas, can you hear Rutenberg’s pleas? [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:10 pm
More recently, in Gilmer v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
Google Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The court however dismissed the inmate's claim that denial of access to a computer and printer violated his RUIPA rights.In Johnson v. [read post]
