Search for: "THOMPSON V AIR FORCE"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2009, 4:04 pm
Allred, the Chief Trial Judge of the Air Force Pacific Judiciary Region, about depositions, VTC testimony, and even VTC videotaped depositions, using the court-martial case of United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 3:00 am
The case is Thompson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:31 am
Air Force and the Bureau of Land Management for not demolishing the bunker, presumably because teenagers would never have found somewhere else to hold a rave when unsupervised by their parents. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm
On Monday, CAAF reversed the Air Force Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:01 pm
The decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:47 am
It appears that the last Air Force published opinion that has actually appeared in the Military Justice Reporter was issued on 3 June 201: United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:13 am
On Monday, CAAF heard two oral arguments, both in Air Force cases. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:13 pm
Where a co-actor’s case is resolved by NJP, the Air Force Court holds, it will be considered as part of a sentence disparity analysis. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:22 am
Trina Thompson v Monroe College In 2009 Trina Thompson sued Monroe College for $72,000 because she couldn’t find a job after graduating. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 5:48 pm
Earlier this week, I gave a presentation to Air Force defense counsel assigned in CONUS. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm
United Air Lines, 10-cv-1090-ES-SCM (D.N.J. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
Dep’t of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. 0120100908 (Oct. 1, 2010), an EEOC complaint where the Commission found that the Agency had retaliated against the Complainant but failed to award the Complainant compensatory damages. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:31 am
The Commission’s propensity to awarding only limited compensatory damages was further demonstrated in Thompson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:33 am
v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
Midwest Air Traffic Control Service, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:29 pm
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
Thompson Bayliss, Abrams & Bayliss LLP.Raul Piombo, Movant, pro se.U.S. [read post]
