Search for: "THOMSEN v. THOMSEN"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm
Original Article 09/17/2010 By Marian V. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Tahyar, Linda Chatman Thomsen, and Amelia T.R. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:28 pm
., Stander, V. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:12 pm
Supreme Court in Iancu v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
American Banana Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
American Banana Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
American Banana Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
Coogan v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Callahan, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, July 20, 2018 Tags: Janus Capital v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
There have been a number of settlements of libel actions which have resulted in apologies but no statement in open court – for example, Ed Buxton v News Group (the “Sun”) and NOW Magazine, Eason v Kordowski (Solicitors from Hell), Sawalha v Phillips (libel on Spectator blog), Laker v News Group (body scanner libel), Islam Expo v Spectator, Forzini v Times Newspapers, Gordon Taylor v Associated Newspapers There… [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, the principal laws that protect investors and preserve business integrity are (i) the Securities Act of 1933, (ii) the Securities Act of 1934, (iii) the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, (iv) the Investment Company Act of 1940, (v) the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and (vi) the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:19 am
He rightly points out that companies – by which he means trading companies – “already have a wide range of legal means to protect their brand and to prevent unfair competition” and draws attention to the notorious cases in which companies have brought (and, importantly, threatened) libel actions against individuals: the McLibel litigation, British Chiropractic Association v Singh, General Electric Healthcare v Professor Henrik Thomsen and the still… [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:45 am
Turnbull v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:09 am
Miller (University of Iowa College of Law), on Monday, February 26, 2018 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Buyouts, Delaware law, DGCL Section 102, Director liability, Duty of care, Fiduciary duties, In re Revlon, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Smith v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(IP Law Blog) US Copyright – Decisions District Court C D California: Politico’s use of Henley songs copyright infringement – not fair use: Henley v Devore (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) 8th Cir: Famous Dave’s magic words: copyright assignments and settlement agreements: Thomsen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am
Bush in December 2001, handed down a decision, Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
” This is similar to the tone used by former Division of Enforcement Director Linda Chatman Thomsen in a May 2008 speech in which she said: “the Commission rarely sues directors solely in their capacity as directors. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Alcon v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
Thomsen, — F.3d —, 2016 WL 4039711 (9th Cir. 2016) (fraud; restitution; Guidelines identify-theft offense characteristic) Defendant was convicted of 32 counts of tax fraud. [read post]
