Search for: "THOMSEN v. THOMSEN"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 11:03 am
Thomsen, Linda Chatman Thomsen, Linda Thomsen, Marketing, Mitchell Zuklie, Musical Chairs, Orrick, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Partner Issues, Paul Hastings, Peter Krakaur, Peter Lattman, Ralph Baxter, Reid Horovitz, Sara Randazzo, Shearman & Sterling, Thomas J. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:28 pm
., Stander, V. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:18 am
In Luedtke v Luedtke Thomsen, 2012 WL 2562405 (S.D.Ind.) [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:11 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York held May 24 (Development Specialists Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:25 pm
Powers and R. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
” This is similar to the tone used by former Division of Enforcement Director Linda Chatman Thomsen in a May 2008 speech in which she said: “the Commission rarely sues directors solely in their capacity as directors. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
There have been a number of settlements of libel actions which have resulted in apologies but no statement in open court – for example, Ed Buxton v News Group (the “Sun”) and NOW Magazine, Eason v Kordowski (Solicitors from Hell), Sawalha v Phillips (libel on Spectator blog), Laker v News Group (body scanner libel), Islam Expo v Spectator, Forzini v Times Newspapers, Gordon Taylor v Associated Newspapers There… [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
January 10th: SEC’s New Whistleblower Bounty Program - Richard Owens of Latham & Watkins and Linda Chatman Thomsen of Davis Polk & Wardwell will discuss the new regulation and how it may likely affect capital market participants, including the likely final provisions of the regulation, who will and who will not qualify for “whistleblower” status, what constitutes “original information,” the size of the “bounties” and much more. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm
Original Article 09/17/2010 By Marian V. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:19 am
He rightly points out that companies – by which he means trading companies – “already have a wide range of legal means to protect their brand and to prevent unfair competition” and draws attention to the notorious cases in which companies have brought (and, importantly, threatened) libel actions against individuals: the McLibel litigation, British Chiropractic Association v Singh, General Electric Healthcare v Professor Henrik Thomsen and the still… [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(IP Law Blog) US Copyright – Decisions District Court C D California: Politico’s use of Henley songs copyright infringement – not fair use: Henley v Devore (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) 8th Cir: Famous Dave’s magic words: copyright assignments and settlement agreements: Thomsen v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:01 am
In Thomsen v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:52 pm
Last week the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers Minnesota) ruled in Thomsen v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:29 am
Back in 1995, Thomsen worked with Famous Dave’s “flagship” Linden Hills Twin City location on the [...] [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:09 pm
Thomsen will have to pay GE's costs if he loses the case. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, the principal laws that protect investors and preserve business integrity are (i) the Securities Act of 1933, (ii) the Securities Act of 1934, (iii) the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, (iv) the Investment Company Act of 1940, (v) the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and (vi) the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
V. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 9:34 am
The most famous substantial transformation case is U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 8:43 am
See for example:http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/07/more-rhetoric-in-warf-v-cirm-battle.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/07/more-on-warf-cirm-conflict-in-research.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/07/stratagene-loses-jury-verdict-to.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2005/12/invitrogen-wins-against-clontech-at.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2005/10/district-court-reversed-in-invitrogen.htmlIn this simplistic view of the world, the patents of Invitrogen are "good" patents, but the… [read post]
