Search for: "TILLMAN v. UNITED STATES"
Results 41 - 60
of 192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2007, 1:30 am
Tillman, 8 F.3d 17, 19 (11th Cir.1993) (Government bears the burden of persuasion); United States v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am
("The people do not vote for the 'Officers of the United States.'"); United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:25 pm
[That statute disqualifies a person from "holding any office under the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme… [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:51 pm
See Tillman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:50 am
Bush v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:01 am
Part V will consider the meaning of the phrase "office . . . under the United States," which appears in the Incompatibility Clause, the Impeachment Disqualification Clause, the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and the Elector Incompatibility Clause. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 1:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Justice Gorsuch was the most interested questioner on whether the President was an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Thornton, supra) (emphasis added). [8] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 2:58 pm
In March, Seth Barrett Tillman and I performed a careful comparison of the New York Constitution of 1894 and the United States Constitution of 1788. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:25 pm
United States (2014) largely follows the arguments in “Executing the Treaty Power”; and the works have been cited extensively by many other scholars and courts. [read post]
