Search for: "TIMOTHY JOST"
Results 1 - 20
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2021, 7:52 am
(Kenneth Jost, Jost on Justice) Petty Sticklerism That Fortuitously Benefits An Undocumented Immigrant is Still Petty Sticklerism (Michael Dorf, Dorf on Law) Supreme Court’s Ethics Problems Are Bigger Than Coney Barrett (Timothy O’Brien, Bloomberg) Republicans say court packing is ‘unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2020-2021 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
Timothy JostAs Texas v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Below the fold are the results of the 2019-2020 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Timothy Jost, a professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law, has decried the use of guidance to promulgate this measure. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 8:22 pm
“A Federal District Judge Seems Determined to Strike Down the Affordable Care Act”: Timothy Jost has this guest post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:55 am
Timothy Jost is Emeritus Professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:07 am
Scholar Timothy Jost explained the legal situation in a blog post written just after the court decision in August. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:30 am
Kinney Access to Health Insurance and Health Benefits - Timothy Stoltzfus Jost Legal Battles against Discrimination in Healthcare - Dayna Bowen Matthew B. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 11:55 am
For more details about what the possible answers might be, read the op-ed in the New York Times that this list came from, by Harold Pollack of the University of Chicago and Timothy Jost of Washington and Lee University. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am
Timothy Jost at Health Affairs Blog provides commentary on the order, and Steven Mazie at The Economist and Alina Salganicoff at Medium discuss last week’s oral arguments in the case. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am
Additional commentary comes from Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, Adam Feldman at Empirical SCOTUS, Marci Hamilton at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Timothy Jost at Health Affairs Blog, Alison Howard at CNS News, Marty Lederman at Balkinization, Justin Sadowsky at Dubitante, David Gans at New Republic, and Sister Simone Campbell in an op-ed for CNN. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:25 am
At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Timothy Sandefur discusses the case and urges the Court to grant review. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm
Segall at ACS Law, Carrie Severino at National Review, Timothy G. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
Health-care symposium contributors: Nicholas Bagley – University of Michigan Randy Barnett – Georgetown Michael Cannon – Cato David Rivkin – BakerHostetler Einer Elhauge – Harvard Tom Fisher – Indiana Abbe Gluck – Yale Brianne Gorod – Constitutional Accountability Center Timothy Jost – Washington and Lee Adam White – Boyden Gray & Associates Housing symposium contributors: Cory Andrews – Washington… [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
” At The Hill, Timothy Jost discusses the possible consequences if the Court were to hold in King v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:42 am
At the Health Affairs Blog, Timothy Jost discusses efforts by Republican senators to introduce “transition plans” to deal with a decision by the Court striking down the availability of tax subsidies for individuals who purchase their health insurance on an exchange operated by the federal government. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:09 am
At the Health Affairs Blog, Timothy Jost analyzes the decision, which he describes as “momentous”: “Justice Scalia’s opinion, were it supported by a clear majority, could have largely eliminated decades of court decisions allowing the federal courts to enforce the Medicaid law,” but “Justice Breyer’s concurrence muddies the waters a bit” by “leav[ing] open the possibility of judicial enforcement of Medicaid rights… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall suggests a hypothetical that, in his view, proves that the government should prevail, while at JURIST Timothy Jost discusses the possible effect of the decision on Medicaid and CHIP, a program that provides health insurance to uninsured children. [read post]
