Search for: "TITUS v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
” United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
In response to the debate the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Gareth Johnson) told the House that these matters would be dealt with in legislation which, he said, was being drafted. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:30 am
Judgment WM Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 12, and statement by Titus Trust on reaching a settlement with three men “who have suffered for many years because of the appalling abuse of John Smyth”. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:23 am
Despite almost half the states legalizing sports betting since the Supreme Court overturned the federal ban in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 6:31 am
Titus, No. 20–633, Justice Sotomayor issued a dissent from the denial of certiorari. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 6:58 am
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Plea agreement In 2011, pursuant to a plea agreement with the State, John Richard Titus, appellant, pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute a large amount of marijuana, possession with intent to distribute oxycodone, and possession of a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 12:30 am
Particularly, interesting are two issues in the ongoing Cromer v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 7:43 am
Lowry v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:01 am
” [Institute for Justice “Short Circuit” on State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:05 pm
Titus, C.A. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Gerald Godoy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:51 am
” On the other hand, Judge Roger Titus of the district of Maryland wrote, in CASA de Maryland v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
The Court of Appeal applied Ontario’s test for unconscionability (which differs slightly from other jurisdictions, such as in Douez), based on Titus v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
