Search for: "TMS INTERNATIONAL HOLDING CORPORATION" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[Although these are presumptions about how consumers will think, so we’re not just expecting, we’re hypothesizing and holding as a matter of law.] [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Internal contradiction in TM: rebranding could be characterized as contradiction b/t law and marketplace: marketplace gives incentives to rebrand, given lack of legal regulation thereof. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
It’s good to be back with the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) again. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 5:47 am by The Yellow Sheet
Andrew trained at a standard London private practice patent and TM attorney firm and worked on secondment at CSR whilst there. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 7:54 am by The Yellow Sheet
Andrew trained at a standard London private practice patent and TM attorney firm and worked on secondment at CSR whilst there. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:06 am by Marina Chafa
Upon investigating WM (formerly known as Fuhuiyuan International Holdings, Ltd.) and determining that Todt had been sued repeatedly for fraud, including by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), Coronacide promptly declined the purchase order and Todt’s offer to buy the Coronacide test kits. [read post]
International Trade Commission—allows the CBPA to respond more quickly, effectively, and cost-efficiently to design patent infringement. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
The conference, moderated by IPKat’s own Eleonora, discussed the implication of the 2015 EU TM Regulation, recent case-law and Brexit.Important developments in copyright! [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Fossil, Inc., et al, No. 16-202 (SCA Redux plus TM issue) Eligibility and CBM: DataTreasury Corporation v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that supplying a single, commodity component of a multi-component invention from the United States is an infringing act under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm by Dennis Crouch
Fossil, Inc., et al, No. 16-202 (SCA Redux plus TM issue) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Fossil, Inc., et al, No. 16-202 (SCA Redux plus TM issue) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]