Search for: "TRUMP v. COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
” Among other things, that means that it is quite possible that “military operations in support of United States counterterrorism efforts” are taking place in a manner and in countries other than those listed in the unclassified letter. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
House of Representatives (by a vote of 232-197) and the Senate (57-43) determined that Donald Trump engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021; that such conduct amounted to “high crimes and misdemeanors”; that Trump’s conduct disqualified him from holding any office under the United States by virtue of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (which the Article of Impeachment expressly cited); and that Trump… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Trump himself offers the Court at least three such “off-ramps,” and the respondent Colorado Republican State Central Committee (CRSCC) proposes two others. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Despite a recommendation by the House of Representatives’ Jan. 6 Select Committee, Smith chose not to. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:53 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm
To organize those rallies, IRA employees posed as U.S. grassroots entities and persons and made contact with Trump supporters and Trump Campaign officials in the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Trump, 928 F. 3d 226 (2d Cir. 2019), vacated as moot sub nom, Biden v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE: EVIDENCE §5501 (1st ed.) [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Motive, Means, and Opportunity [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
This admission goes a long way to support our conclusion: the meaning of "officers of the United States" did not drift from 1788 to 1868. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
The development of in-house units probably increases the likelihood of deception b/c they can frame the content to be exactly like the publication they’re working for.Naming and (Re)Claiming Laura Heymann What makes something a name and how much do audiences assume that a name has connotative and denotative functions? [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
USA LLC, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
Moreover, this initiative may die or be limited with the new Trump administration. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
Moreover, this initiative may die or be limited with the new Trump administration. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
