Search for: "TURNER v. CALIFORNIA" Results 101 - 120 of 298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2023, 7:55 am by Daniel Carpenter-Gold
Yesterday, the UCLA Environmental Law Clinic filed a brief in the California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 8:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  On September 27, 2018, the Kentucky Supreme Court, in Northern Kentucky Area Development District v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
The cases include those brought by the Duke of Sussex, Nikki Sanderson, Fiona Wightman and Michael Turner. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, federal law protects labor-related speech (for or against) in private workplaces, without protecting other speech.[235] The California Supreme Court concluded that a similar California statute allowing labor-related picketing on private property (but not other picketing) was constitutional,[236] though the D.C. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Government has not waived its sovereign immunity for claims arising under the DMCA - The blogging lawyers & attorneys at Thelen in the firm's Technology Law Update The widow woman's land - Texas lawyer Jeff Rambin in his Tyler Appeals Blog Novartis contractor ran a prostitution ring from work - Management consultant Cliff Mintz of BioInsights Inc. in his Bio Job Blog SEC issues new "ComplianceAlert" - Minneapolis attorney David Flower of Lindquist… [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 5:06 pm
Meal and rest break requirements clarified in Brinker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
Massachusetts, 10-8835, Turner v. [read post]
This may require security officers to remain on the premises and on call during paid rest periods, and to carry and monitor a communication device… it is the intent of the Legislature to abrogate, for the security services industry only, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Augustus v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
NAC was found liable on a breach of contract claim in an underlying action against it in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]