Search for: "Tanner v. Winfield" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
” Hence, in Southwark London Borough Council v Tanner  (2001) 1 AC 1 noise nuisance due to a lack of sound proofing between flats was not actionable because the activities causing noise were ordinary use, Ordinary use is not the same as ‘reasonable use’. [read post]