Search for: "Tate v. Hughes" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2022, 1:32 am by Matrix Law
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 2/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:45 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta examined whether the Justice Department subtlely admitted doubts over Trump’s oath in its brief on appeal in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
In the matter of an application by James Hugh Allister and others for Judicial Review  (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Clifford Peoples for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 30th November – 1st December 2022 R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council, heard 7th December 2022. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Erica Goldberg writes that in Hughes v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  To be sure, that wasn’t technically the issue in Griffin’s Case itself:  Chase wasn’t being asked to enjoin Virginia Judge Hugh Sheffey from continuing to serve in office, as would be the case in, e.g., a quo warranto action. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Given that “[s]tates rarely relinquish their sovereign powers,” she asserts, the Supreme Court has required “a clear statement in a compact that they have done so”. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Justice Scalia famously said in his angry dissent from Lawrence v. [read post]