Search for: "Tate v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Tate v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Tate v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 5:22 pm by Howard Friedman
As has been widely reported (CNN), the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals early today in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 2:24 pm by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Bad acts Convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County of distribution of cocaine and related offenses, Donald Edward Tate, appellant, presents for our review two questions: whether the court “allow[ed] inadmissible hearsay into evidence,” and whether the court “allow[ed] inadmissible and prejudicial ‘other ... [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:52 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:52 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:51 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 1:14 pm by Unreported Opinions
In his timely appeal, Tate, representing himself, argues that States must provide “juvenile lifers,” like himself, a meaningful opportunity to obtain release from prison based on ... [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Robins, which upheld a state law rule that required large shopping malls to allow leafleters and signature gatherers (a rule that has since been applied by some lower courts to outdoor spaces in private universities[113]); Turner Broadcasting System v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 2:07 pm by Russell Knight
Questions which state the answer within themselves are just a series of rhetorical questions. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:19 am by Daily Record Staff
Tate to testify concerning the reason she was afraid of him ... [read post]