Search for: "Tate v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
” Justice Kagan argued that “[s]tate courts are—or at any rate, are supposed to be—the ‘ultimate expositors of state law,’” and “the corollary is that federal courts should refrain whenever possible from deciding novel or difficult state-law questions. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court case (Michigan v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 9:21 am
Drell's decision in Bonadona v. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 1:03 pm
Kai Tate Mann won in State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am
Supreme Court for argument time to support a challenge to New York City gun restrictions,” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:43 pm
Distinguishing National Meat Association v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm
Hisquierdo, 439 U.S. 572, 581, 99 S.Ct. 802, 59 L.Ed.2d 1 (1979) (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 1:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am
Tate v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:15 pm
Sweetser, 890 S.W.2d 250 (Ark. 1994) (premises liability) Tate v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:43 am
Fontenot v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:02 pm
Carol Longenecker Schmidt and Kai Tate Mann won in State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 11:13 am
"Auto-brewery syndrome" (or "gut fermentation syndrome") is apparently a thing -- but, the Maine high court says, the judge permissibly excluded a particular expert who wanted to testify this thing might have happened in this case.From State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
From 1812 through the mid-20th century, the state immunity doctrine was interpreted in accordance with the Supreme Court case Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
On 12 February 2019 Mann J handed down judgment in the case of Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2019] EWHC 246 (Ch) which was an Article 8 and nuisance claim arising out of the fact that the claimants’ flats are overlooked by a viewing platform at the Tate Gallery. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
" In other words, said the Appellate Division, "judicial inquiry is constrained to determining whether 'the actual result of the arbitration process' — without evaluation of the underlying rationale — on its face, and 'because of its reach, . . . violates an explicit law of this [s]tate'. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
In Granholm v. [read post]
