Search for: "Tax Collector of North Reading v. Reading" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Kelly
There’s been no official reaction from NC tax collectors – but that may just be a matter of time. [read post]
  However, among the 70 topics that are included on the list of items to be addressed in the Extraordinary Session are several tax related issues including the state unemployment trust fund, sales and use tax imposed on items leased or rented for re-lease or re-rental, severance taxes, the classification of workers as independent contractors vs. employees, and business tax incentives and credits, including an inventory tax credit carryforward. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Marshall celebrates the marching armies and revenue collectors who range from the St. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
But not content with taxing its own citizens and businesses to the max, the Empire State is now unleashing its tax collectors on the rest of the nation. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
But not content with taxing its own citizens and businesses to the max, the Empire State is now unleashing its tax collectors on the rest of the nation. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
The question is whether a debt collector violates the statute if it does not provide that notice, but it did not know that it was required to do so by the law. ------- Title: Mac's Shell Service v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
That was a  change for before, when tax collectors were allowed to confiscate arms from people who could not pay the property tax. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The collector can sue the officer, the LAPD, and the city too. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Fairhaven, MA; Lawrence Santos, President) A&B Tax And Bookkeeping Service, Inc. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the 1929 Persons case, Viscount Sankey of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom, which was, at the time, Canada’s highest court, said, “The British North America Act planted in Canada [is] a living tree capable of growth and expansion within its natural limits. [read post]