Search for: "Taylor v. Chang " Results 61 - 80 of 1,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2012, 9:48 am by Jonathan H. Adler
My views have changed a bit, and any fair reading of my work will indicate as much, just as it will quickly reveal that I am neither a Republican nor a libertarian-hater. . . . [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Another decision illustrating limitations imposed by a disciplinary settlement agreement with respect to action by the appointing authority is Taylor v Cass, 122 A.D.2d 885. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Another decision illustrating limitations imposed by a disciplinary settlement agreement with respect to action by the appointing authority is Taylor v Cass, 122 A.D.2d 885. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:25 am
Stores Co. (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1223 and whether Alvarez was effectively nullified by the United States Supreme Court decision in Taylor v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Scope of arbitration Richfield Springs CSD v Allen, 270 A.D.2d 734 Changes in health insurance benefits may be initiated by a third party that actually provides the benefit. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:14 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Supreme Court addressed the EEOC’s methods in the 2015 case Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 10:30 am by Giles Peaker
Taylor v Slough Borough Council (2020) EWHC 3520 (Ch) An appeal on the issue of whether a Council landlord’s initial failure to have regard to the Public Sector Equality Duty on commencing possession proceedings could be remedied by later performance of that duty. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:01 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
A Juror Who Knew the Victim The Court of Appeals, Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana rendered an opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
Vesting health insurance rightsHandy v Schoharie County, Appellate Division 244 A.D.2d 842In the Handy case, the Appellate Division said a legislative body may adopt of a resolution that alters a retiree's health insurance benefits and that such a change can be legally applied to people who retired prior to the vote to change benefits.In December 1995, the Schoharie County Board of Supervisors adopted three motions changing its policy with respect to its… [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Chubb Insurance Company of Canada, 2017 ABQB 413, and in Taylor & Lieberman v. [read post]
In New Zealand, in R v Grayson and Taylor [1997] 1 NZLR 399 (CA) the Court of Appeal held that it could provide a remedy (exclusion) in respect of a breach of the Bill of Rights in the course of a criminal trial. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:15 am by Giles Peaker
The codification of Spencer v Taylor in removing the need for a s.21 notice to specify the exact date of the end of a period of the tenancy (not, as the DCLG notes wrongly have it ‘the exact date a tenancy comes to an end’). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 8:10 am by admin
by Sarah Taylor, SpringerLyle ••• In June of 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided an important issue regarding the warning labels on prescription drugs in Pliva, Inc. et al v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 12:00 am
In the US, KSR v Teleflex clearly reinforces this view.So, is Bill right - can large companies come up with game changing / disruptive technologies, or is it all just too hard for them? [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:33 am
Taylor Borzu Sabahi & Kabir Duggal, Philip Morris Brands Sàrl v. [read post]